Very good movie !
Added 11/4/2009
If you like drama and family problem solvers at the end you'll love this one , out of this world cast and directed to the peak ! This one should still be getting awards .
0 out of 0 people found this helpful.
|
DARK CHARACTERS
Added 1/18/2009
THIS WAS A GREAT MOVIE, YOU COULD SEE NICK NOLTIE SLIPPING AWAY DURING THE MOVIE.I HAD A UNCLE LIKE COBURNS CHARACTOR HE TREATED MY AUNT LIKE HELL.ALL THRU THE 1950S HE MADE HER LIFE MISRIBLE.DRUNK 90% OF THE TIME.I ALMOST THOUGHT NOLTIE PULLED OUT HIS OWN TOOTH.
0 out of 0 people found this helpful.
|
With a little more silence this movie would have been perfect...
Added 12/9/2008
I want to start by saying that on paper, `Affliction' is one of the most impressive character studies I've ever had the privilege of reading. The novel, written by Russell Banks (that author I keep touting as the greatest American writer of all time), is an outstanding piece of literature; a marvelous study of the slow progression of anger, pain, misery and ultimate insanity. On paper, `Affliction' is a masterpiece; on the screen, `Affliction' is merely a good movie.
It is a good movie, don't get me wrong, but this is not a great movie.
The problem lies in the pacing, so honestly I guess I can heap all the blame on director Paul Schrader. The thing about the novel is that Banks has this beautiful way of allowing his characters to stew in their own predicaments. There are long passages that seem to just build more tension and cast more darkness over the story and the characters within it. I think back to what Atom Egoyan did with `The Sweet Hereafter', allowing the sweeping views of the snow covered town to bring to life the `stillness' of Banks novel. He complemented the script with his expert direction. `Affliction' seems a little too rushed. The script is impeccable, much like `The Sweet Hereafter', changing very little in adaptation and staying very true to what Banks originally penned.
I can't help but think that this film would have been perfect had it added about thirty minutes of silence; interjecting random scenes of serene camera movement throughout the bustle of the story to establish the mood needed to elevate this film and bring it to the novel's level.
The film tells the story of Wade Whitehouse, a man pushed to the edge of his very sanity thanks to the people all around him. He lives in the same small town in which he grew up. He works the same dead end thankless job he's worked almost all his life. He's tormented by memories of an abusive childhood and he's struggling to win the war against his ex-wife over the affections of their daughter Jill. A series of events (an accidental death of a well respected man and the death of Wade's mother) start a domino effect almost, causing Wade to drift rapidly into the depths of insanity.
The film lacks the emotional impact the novel did, for the novel allowed us time to appreciate the mental deterioration overtaking Wade, and it gave us enough background in order to understand it. Here, his freefall seems almost too sudden at times.
Performance wise though, this is a goldmine. I am not a fan of Nick Nolte. I find his breed of overacting to be a hindrance to the films he inhabits. In fact, aside from his rather surprisingly controlled performance in `Cape Fear' I have hated everything he's done. This though, is a masterclass. Honestly, the fact that this is Nolte floors me. He has such deep understanding of Wade's character (maybe even more so than Schrader) and he exhibits that knowledge in every movement he makes. He delivers such a grounded and emotionally rich performance here; I'm stunned. James Coburn won the Oscar for his sadistic portrayal of Wade's abusive father, and while I'm not sure I'd hand him the Oscar I do believe he is marvelous here. Sissy Spacek is not the face I pictured when reading the novel, and so casting her as Margie seemed a bit off, but she works wonders with the part. These performances feel so small yet hit you very hard. They work far better than the film itself.
In the end I have to say that this is a very good movie, and if you have not read the novel you may even consider this a great movie. I was expecting a little more time invested in establishing the dark serenity that comes from reading Banks' work, so I was disappointed with Schrader direction.
Still, the film is a solid B, but the novel is an A+.
0 out of 0 people found this helpful.
|
A noir with a touch of Bergman!
Added 9/11/2008
Paul Shrader is one the few filmmakers who never has bent his convictions about propelling his independent entries, permeated of dark and bleak memories. Like Fassbinder for instance, he is well aware his role in the cinema , what is to become a sleepless lighthouse around our ethical consciousness.
Small constable investigates a supposed shooting, but he is firmly convinced it was a premeditate murder. Meanwhile he is haunted by his childhood because his drunken and abusive father.
This was for Coburn the great acting of his lifetime and that's why he won a more than deserved Academy Award.
0 out of 0 people found this helpful.
|
Ready to Implode
Added 3/24/2008
Nick Nolte is excellent as a man who is seriously about to implode. Watching him in this role is like waiting to hear thunder after the lightning strikes. He is constantly on the verge of losing it, while he is also constantly trying to smother his wrath. You get the feeling that there is going to be a four alarm fire erupting at any time and Nick Nolte is about to run out of the water that is dousing his flames inside.
James Coburn plays his father. A nasty man, always drunk, always evil. We begin to see where Nick Nolte's character got his deep rooted angst. Being raised by such a man has left permanent scars inside of Nolte's character. Everyone that comes into contact with Coburn's character is left wounded.
It's a story about a cop in a small town who is trying to connect with his daughter, fight his ex-wife for custody, begin a new life with a new woman, tend to his father who has just lost his wife, investigate a hunting accident involving his best friend and coming to grips with his past, his family and his future.
This is no light hearted movie. There is depth and feeling. This movie might not make you feel happy, but it succeeds in reaching into your emotions and forcing you to feel what the main character is feeling. Not always pretty, but very effective.
This is one of the better movies I have seen. The acting is superb, the story is meaningful, the scenery makes you feel cold. 5 stars for this film for having the ability to bring out emotions in the viewer. Not for kids, heartbreaking, sad and perfect for what it was trying to do.
1 out of 1 people found this helpful.
|
Very good movie !
Added 11/4/2009
If you like drama and family problem solvers at the end you'll love this one , out of this world cast and directed to the peak ! This one should still be getting awards .
0 out of 0 people found this helpful.
|
DARK CHARACTERS
Added 1/18/2009
THIS WAS A GREAT MOVIE, YOU COULD SEE NICK NOLTIE SLIPPING AWAY DURING THE MOVIE.I HAD A UNCLE LIKE COBURNS CHARACTOR HE TREATED MY AUNT LIKE HELL.ALL THRU THE 1950S HE MADE HER LIFE MISRIBLE.DRUNK 90% OF THE TIME.I ALMOST THOUGHT NOLTIE PULLED OUT HIS OWN TOOTH.
0 out of 0 people found this helpful.
|
With a little more silence this movie would have been perfect...
Added 12/9/2008
I want to start by saying that on paper, `Affliction' is one of the most impressive character studies I've ever had the privilege of reading. The novel, written by Russell Banks (that author I keep touting as the greatest American writer of all time), is an outstanding piece of literature; a marvelous study of the slow progression of anger, pain, misery and ultimate insanity. On paper, `Affliction' is a masterpiece; on the screen, `Affliction' is merely a good movie.
It is a good movie, don't get me wrong, but this is not a great movie.
The problem lies in the pacing, so honestly I guess I can heap all the blame on director Paul Schrader. The thing about the novel is that Banks has this beautiful way of allowing his characters to stew in their own predicaments. There are long passages that seem to just build more tension and cast more darkness over the story and the characters within it. I think back to what Atom Egoyan did with `The Sweet Hereafter', allowing the sweeping views of the snow covered town to bring to life the `stillness' of Banks novel. He complemented the script with his expert direction. `Affliction' seems a little too rushed. The script is impeccable, much like `The Sweet Hereafter', changing very little in adaptation and staying very true to what Banks originally penned.
I can't help but think that this film would have been perfect had it added about thirty minutes of silence; interjecting random scenes of serene camera movement throughout the bustle of the story to establish the mood needed to elevate this film and bring it to the novel's level.
The film tells the story of Wade Whitehouse, a man pushed to the edge of his very sanity thanks to the people all around him. He lives in the same small town in which he grew up. He works the same dead end thankless job he's worked almost all his life. He's tormented by memories of an abusive childhood and he's struggling to win the war against his ex-wife over the affections of their daughter Jill. A series of events (an accidental death of a well respected man and the death of Wade's mother) start a domino effect almost, causing Wade to drift rapidly into the depths of insanity.
The film lacks the emotional impact the novel did, for the novel allowed us time to appreciate the mental deterioration overtaking Wade, and it gave us enough background in order to understand it. Here, his freefall seems almost too sudden at times.
Performance wise though, this is a goldmine. I am not a fan of Nick Nolte. I find his breed of overacting to be a hindrance to the films he inhabits. In fact, aside from his rather surprisingly controlled performance in `Cape Fear' I have hated everything he's done. This though, is a masterclass. Honestly, the fact that this is Nolte floors me. He has such deep understanding of Wade's character (maybe even more so than Schrader) and he exhibits that knowledge in every movement he makes. He delivers such a grounded and emotionally rich performance here; I'm stunned. James Coburn won the Oscar for his sadistic portrayal of Wade's abusive father, and while I'm not sure I'd hand him the Oscar I do believe he is marvelous here. Sissy Spacek is not the face I pictured when reading the novel, and so casting her as Margie seemed a bit off, but she works wonders with the part. These performances feel so small yet hit you very hard. They work far better than the film itself.
In the end I have to say that this is a very good movie, and if you have not read the novel you may even consider this a great movie. I was expecting a little more time invested in establishing the dark serenity that comes from reading Banks' work, so I was disappointed with Schrader direction.
Still, the film is a solid B, but the novel is an A+.
0 out of 0 people found this helpful.
|
